tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2378641028796404396.post8982151325155922791..comments2023-09-15T04:25:03.409-07:00Comments on More Second Thoughts: Here we go againJon Mendelsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02842221456853513469noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2378641028796404396.post-16079354273574129732008-11-28T08:17:00.000-08:002008-11-28T08:17:00.000-08:00There was no religion involved. Nowhere in the pr...There was no religion involved. Nowhere in the proposition did it state any religious doctrine or affiliations.<BR/><BR/>It is about VALUE SYSTEMS and the WILL of the peole to not allow 4 black robed individuals in the bench to mandate what our VALUE SYSTEM should be.<BR/><BR/>The peole have spoken...again and again and again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2378641028796404396.post-66631309506249271432008-11-19T17:09:00.000-08:002008-11-19T17:09:00.000-08:00Sorry Jon:Your blogg makes too much sense. Those ...Sorry Jon:<BR/>Your blogg makes too much sense. Those who see the passage of Prop. 8 as a religious victory have little idea of either religious freedom or victory. How do you do a victory dance when you have hurt so many people? And, how is religion served by Prop. 8 unless you go back to punishing adultery by death? (Biblical no?) Marriage is, in the Bible, the union of a man and as many women as he could afford. It is all so confusing when you take only part of the Bible literally. Except, however, the fact that we are to love one.Dr. Mike McLellanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16446163002343284309noreply@blogger.com